Policy and program implementation

Plan for policy, programmatic, and fiscal sustainability For example, a partner might create a strategic plan that identifies where funding will come from once initial funds are exhausted. It helps to identify how, when, and by whom implementation will be assessed. Monitoring of implementation keeps everyone involved aware of any possible barriers—as well as any intended and unintended impacts of the work.

After implementation, resources and other supports from stakeholders may decrease. Policy sustainability benefits from planning for these changes from the start of the policy process.

Planning for sustainability can involve programmatic, administrative, fiscal, and other key elements of the policy. This tool can help you assess capacity for approaches to preventing teen dating violence—but its framework can also be applied to other public health problems.

Capacity refers to the information, skills, resources, abilities, and supports needed to develop, evaluate, and sustain a public health initiative.

Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link. Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy. Section Navigation. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Syndicate. One is that implementation is the continuation of the rational planning and decision-making process that is used to determine which policies to adopt. This view sees policy implementation as a continuation of rational organizational design, with a knowable and certain outcome.

The other theory is the interactive model, that policy implementation is a continuation of the politics that results in the adoption of public policies, and that outcomes are uncertain. Policy implementation can be seen as a process of bargaining.

Often, one unit of government cannot force another unit to do or refrain from doing something. When participants in a policy process share a common interest in coming to a decision but have divergent values and objectives, the bargaining model is often used to make decisions about implementation. Implementation becomes a process of complex proposals and counter-proposals among different government actors, in which the initial aims of each party are slowly modified to permit an agreement to be reached.

The parties may include interest groups, citizens, other units of government, and other actors. Implementation affects how well policies are accepted, not just by faithfully adhering to the policy mandate but also by adapting to changing circumstances over time. Successful implementation does depend a great deal on administrative discretion and the know-how to get results. Narrowing the range of administrative latitude in implementation may limit the value of the process, while too wide a scope make it impossible to obtain success.

Implementation may be seen as an evolving process, a response to changing forces and circumstances; it is a struggle over the realization of ideals. There are a large number of possible actors in policy implementation. For example:. The Conditions for Effective Implementation. The problem is often the lack of a valid social science theory.

There are often multiple goals which conflict, multiple veto points, and imperfect information. Demands for large changes in behavior may be met with equal amounts of, hostility, resistence or non-compliance. Agencies may not be supportive of the policy objectives or may not place them high on their list of priorities. There may be a lack of interest or active opposition to the program from organized groups with the resources to combat the policy. Implementation analysis might involve writing a "best-case" scenario and a "worst-case" scenario for each policy alternative, as well as the "most likely" outcome.

The brief outlines this issue and offers potential state-level solutions. This guide outlines a five-step process for implementation: exploration, installation, initial implementation, full implementation, and expansion and scale-up.

It concisely outlines specific steps for state leadership, intermediary organizations, and site-level teams for each stage of implementation. This guidebook provides a description of the steps needed for successfully planning and implementing a parenting intervention.

It provides information for the state, intermediary, and program levels, as well as a glossary of terms, implementation resources, and checklists of implementation milestones by implementation stage.

Skip to main content. Agency links U. Policy and Program Implementation. National Survey of Early Care and Education Summary Briefs The National Survey of Early Care and Education reached 12, families and large numbers of home-based and center-based programs 6, home-based providers, 5, classroom staff, and 8, program directors.